I analyzed 4 different longer-ish public entries and each time got a different response. First said I write like H. G. Wells, then H. P. Lovecraft, then Charles Dickens, and finally Kurt Vonnegut.
So statistically speaking my writing seems to be very broad, but also probably archaic, and 50% likely to be written as if I used my first two initials instead of a name like a normal person.
I dont think this is very accurate. I posted my erotic short story about a succubus and it told me I write like Isaac Asimov. There is no way in hell that story is like his writing.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
So statistically speaking my writing seems to be very broad, but also probably archaic, and 50% likely to be written as if I used my first two initials instead of a name like a normal person.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)