![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Sep. 11th, 2017
(no subject)
Sep. 11th, 2017 08:36 pmI don't like thinking about 9/11. Mainly because it was a horrible thing done to the US, and the catalyst of horrible things the US has done to civil liberties and nations abroad in its name.
But it does bear remembering.
This link will take you to History Commons, a comprehensive timeline of virtually every document-able event even remotely tangentially related to 9/11. It doesn't push an agenda, doesn't push conspiracy theories, just tries to put forward a timeline based on news reports, books and articles.
It's a fascinating read, from the possibility of a fifth flight that may have been planned to be hijacked (http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a900hijackingaverted#a900hijackingaverted), the Able Danger coverup (http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=%22able+danger%22&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go) and just general wierdness (http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=%22Susan+Lindauer%22&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go)
It can be quite a read, but there is more signal than noise, and while documentation isn't confirmation, there's a lot of data in there to read.
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
But it does bear remembering.
This link will take you to History Commons, a comprehensive timeline of virtually every document-able event even remotely tangentially related to 9/11. It doesn't push an agenda, doesn't push conspiracy theories, just tries to put forward a timeline based on news reports, books and articles.
It's a fascinating read, from the possibility of a fifth flight that may have been planned to be hijacked (http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a900hijackingaverted#a900hijackingaverted), the Able Danger coverup (http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=%22able+danger%22&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go) and just general wierdness (http://www.historycommons.org/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=%22Susan+Lindauer%22&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go)
It can be quite a read, but there is more signal than noise, and while documentation isn't confirmation, there's a lot of data in there to read.
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project