Wonder why our priices are unbelievably L0W? We are currently clearing our goods at incredibily cheeap sa1e-priice in connection with the shutdown of our shop and the closure of the stockhouse. Don't missss your lucky chance to get the best priicce on discoouunt 802.11 cables!
Yeah... 802.11 is wireless networking.... which... doesn't need cables.
You should see some of the spam subject lines I get:
can you be any smaller utwr you much have the smallest rbracy wqjeszfyj that is why they call you smallie znmrjex nzeyjzvo How did you compare to the other guys in the locker room x
I'd tell you what the actual messages said if SpamAssassin didn't score them so highly that they immediately got sent to /dev/null. :-)
They are going for the totally clueless market. Remember, their costs are so low that if one person in a *million* responds, they make a profit.
Which is why nothing less than making spamming carry *huge* fines (parttly to pay for tyhe trouble in tracking them down) is ever going to make a dent in it.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 12:37 am (UTC)What a worthless git she is. Why do I bother paying her to do anything at all?
Good help is hard to find these days.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 02:49 am (UTC)Subject: The cheapest 802.11 A/B/G Cables ANYWHERE
To: toasty@dragondata.com
6 foot 802.11b cable: $11.99!
6 foot 802.11g cable: $14.99! 5X FASTER!
Wonder why our priices are unbelievably L0W?
We are currently clearing our goods at incredibily cheeap sa1e-priice in connection with the shutdown of our shop and the closure of the stockhouse. Don't missss your lucky chance to get the best priicce on discoouunt 802.11 cables!
Yeah... 802.11 is wireless networking.... which... doesn't need cables.
I'm assuming they'd just ship me an empty box.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 07:20 am (UTC)can you be any smaller utwr
you much have the smallest rbracy wqjeszfyj
that is why they call you smallie znmrjex nzeyjzvo
How did you compare to the other guys in the locker room x
I'd tell you what the actual messages said if SpamAssassin didn't score them so highly that they immediately got sent to /dev/null. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-12 11:32 pm (UTC)Which is why nothing less than making spamming carry *huge* fines (parttly to pay for tyhe trouble in tracking them down) is ever going to make a dent in it.